p. 1−14
2538-3906
Vol.38/No.2
p. 15−27
2538-3906
Vol.38/No.2
p. 29−44
2538-3906
Vol.38/No.2
p. 45−56
2538-3906
Vol.38/No.2
p. 57−76
2538-3906
Vol.38/No.2
p. 77−90
2538-3906
Vol.38/No.2
p. 91−105
2538-3906
Vol.38/No.2
p. 107−121
2538-3906
Vol.38/No.2
p. 123−136
2538-3906
Vol.38/No.2
p. 137−147
2538-3906
Vol.38/No.2
p. 149−156
2538-3906
Vol.38/No.2
p. 157−166
2538-3906
Vol.38/No.2
p. 167−182
2538-3906
Vol.38/No.2
p. 183−201
2538-3906
Vol.38/No.2
p. 203−218
2538-3906
Vol.38/No.2
p. 219−231
2538-3906
Vol.38/No.2
p. 1−15
2538-3906
Vol.38/No.2
? > 95?) recorded from 1995 to 2008 at 8 three component short period stations from Tabriz Telemetry Seismic Network with high signal-to-noise ratio. The P to S converted phases from 410 and 660 km discontinuities are delayed by more 2 and 1 s with respect to IASP91 global reference model, indicating that the upper mantle above 410 km is 3-4% slower and high temperature than the standard earth model. Because the 410 and 660 km discontinuities do not show the same delay, the transition zone is also could be thinner. This could mean that the upper mantle in the region is still influenced by several geodynamical processes involving rifting, uplift and magmatism.]]>
p. 17−28
2538-3906
Vol.38/No.2