Sensitivity analysis of time lapse gravity for monitoring fluid saturation changes in a giant multi-phase gas reservoir located in south of Iran

Authors

1 M.Sc. Graduated, Department of Earth Physics, Institute of Geophysics, University of Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Earth Physics, Institute of Geophysics, University of Tehran, Iran

3 Expert, National Iranian Oil Company, Exploration Directorate, Tehran, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Institute Of Petroleum Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The time lapse gravity method is a widely used technique to monitor the subsurface density changes in time and space. In hydrocarbon reservoirs, the density variations are due to different factors, such as: substitution of fluids with high density contrast, water influx, gas injection, and the variation in reservoir geomechanical behavior. Considering the monitoring of saturation changes in the reservoir that cannot be inferred directly by seismic survey, a forward modelling followed by a sensitivity study is performed to examine that in what conditions the saturation changes are detectable by means of 4D gravity method in the understudy reservoir. Then static and dynamic models of a giant multi-phase gas reservoir are constructed. Then, synthetic gravity data are generated after variation of production time intervals and the number of production and injection wells. In addition to detecting the gravity signal for shallower reservoirs with similar characteristics to our reservoir, a sensitivity analysis was conducted for variation in depth of the reservoir. As either the depth of the reservoir decreases or the number of the production wells and production time periods increases, the produced gravity signal is more prone to be detectable by means of modern offshore gravimeters. The gravity signal could be detected with the maximum magnitude range of 9 -  in different scenarios as a consequence of gas-water substitution, which is consistent with water drive support from surrounding aquifers. Therefore, this method is applicable for providing complementary and even independent source of information about the saturation front changes in the under-study reservoir.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Alnes, H., Eiken, O., Nooner, S., Sasagava, G., Stenvold, T. and Zumberge, M., 2011, Results from Sliepner gravity monitoring: updated density and tempreture distribution of CO2 plume. Energy Procedia, 4, 5504-5511.
Brady, J. L., Hare, J. L., Ferguson, J. F., Seibert, J. E., Klopping, F. J., Chen, T. and Niebauer, T., 2008, Results of the worlds first 4D microgravity surveillance of a waterflood-Prudhoe Bay, Alaska. Society of Petroleum Engineers Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering, 11, 824-831.
Eiken, O., Stenvold, T., Zumberge, M., Alnes, H. and Sasagawa, G., 2008, Gravimetric monitoring of gas production from the Troll field. Geophysics, 73(6), WA149-WA145.
Eiken, O., Tollefsen, F., Aanvik, F. and Alson, T., 2005, Surface geophysical monitoring of gas field. 6th Petroleum Geology Conference, 641-650.
Eiken, O., Zumberge, M. A. and Hildebrand, J., 2003, Method for monitoring seafloor subsidence and for gravity monitoring an underground hydrocarbon reservoir. USA: University of California, 2, 377500.
Ferguson, J. F., Chen, T., Brady, J., Aiken, C. L. V. and Seibert, J., 2007, The 4D microgravity method for waterflood surveillance: part 2- Gravity measurments for the Prodhoe Ban reservoir, Alaska. Geophysics, 72(2), 33-43.
Gelderen, M. V., Haagmans, R. and Bilker, M., 1999, Gravity change and natural gas extraction in Groningen. Geophysical Prospecting, 47.
Glegola, M., Ditmar, P., Bierkens, R. and Vossepoel, F., 2009, Estimation of time-lapse gravity errors due to water table and soil moisture variations. 79th Annual International Meeting, SEG, 976-980.
Hare, J. L., Ferguson, J. F. and Brady, J. L., 2008, The 4D microgravity method for water surveillance: part 4 - Mideling and interpretation of early epoch 4D gravity surveys at Prudoe Ban, Alaska. Geophysics.
Ruiz, H., Agersborg, R., Hille, L. T., Lien, M. and Even, J., 2016, Monitoring offshore reservoirs using 4D gravity and subsidence with improved tide corrections. SEG International Exposition and 86th Annual Meeting.
Sarkowi, M., Kadir, G. and Santoso, D., 2005, Strategy of 4D Microgravity Survey for the Monitoring of Fluid Dynamics in the Subsurface. Antalya, Turkey, World Geothermal Congress, April, 2005.
Siddique, M., 2011, Application of Time Lapse Gravity in History Matching a Gas/Condensate Field. EAGE/SPE Joint Workshop, 04 April 2011.
Stenvold, T., Eiken, O. and landro, M., 2008, Gravimetric monitoring of gas reservoir water influx- A combined gravity and flow modeling approach. Geophysics, 73(6).Taherniya, M., Ghazifard, A., Fatemi Aghda, M., 2013, Predicting subsidence in the South Pars gas field. EJGE, 18.
Tempone, p., Landro, M. and Fajer, E., 2012, 4D gravity response of compacting reservoir: analytical approach. Geophysics, May-June, 77(3).
Van den Beukel, A., 2014, Integrated Reservoir Monitoring of the Ormen Lange field: Time lapse seismic, Time lapse gravity and seafloor deformation monitoring. The Biennial Geophysical Seminar NPF, Extended Abstracts.
Zumberge, G., Stenvold, T., Eiken, O., Sasagawa, S. and Nooner, L., 2006, Precision of seafloor gravity and pressure measurements for reservoir monitoring Geophysics, 73(6).
Emami Niri, M. and Lumley, D. E., 2016, Probabilistic reservoir-property modeling jointly constrained by 3D-seismic data and hydraulic-unit analysis. Reservoir Evaluation and Engineering, 19(2), 253-264.
Journal of the Earth and Space Physics
Volume 44, Issue 4
January 2019
Pages 53-61

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics