Reservoir porosity modelling using support vector regression based on Gaussian kernel in an oil field of Iran

Document Type : Research Article


1 M.Sc. Student, Department of Earth Physics, Institute of Geophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Earth Physics, Institute of Geophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

3 Professor, Department of Earth Physics, Institute of Geophysics, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran


Permeability, porosity and sedimentary facies are the main factors of reservoir characteristics. Porosity indicates the ability of a rock to store fluids. So far, many approaches including linear / nonlinear regressions have been developed to predict porosity. Neural networks have received a lot of attention in recent years, and various types of learning machines based on neural networks have been introduced. Multilayer perceptron neural network (MLP) is one of these networks that proven its ability, but each of these methods has disadvantages. In this research, the support vector machine (SVM) method has been used as the main method for regression and estimation of the reservoir porosity in one of the hydrocarbon reservoirs. This method has been compared with the multilayer perceptron method and the results of each have been investigated.
The best way to get accurate values of physical properties of reservoir is to measure them directly in the laboratory. However, this method has disadvantages: high cost, time consuming, lack of access to the entire depth of the well. For these reasons, geologists extract core from a number of wells and from a specific range. Geologists generally use a statistical approach involving multiple linear or nonlinear regressions to relate reservoir characteristics to each other (eg, porosity and permeability). In these contexts, a linear or non-linear relationship is assumed between porosity and other reservoir characteristics. However, these techniques are insufficient for certain issues, such as heterogeneous reservoirs. Recently, geoscientists have used artificial intelligence (AI) methods, especially neural networks (NNs), to predict reservoir parameters. Neural networks have been widely used in various fields of science and engineering.
To build a three-dimensional model of a reservoir, a thorough knowledge of permeability, porosity and sedimentary facies is required. Well logs and core information are local measurements that do not reflect the behavior of the reservoir as a whole. In addition, well information does not cover the entire field area, while 3D seismic information covers a larger area. Changes in lithology and fluids cause changes in amplitude, wavelet shape, coherence coefficient, and other seismic attributes. These attributes can provide information for building a repository model.
The main purpose of this research is to analyze training machines developed by computer scientists to predict reservoir characteristics such as porosity in vertical and lateral directions with the help of well logs and seismic attributes. The aim is to achieve the following steps to estimate a reliable porosity model of the reservoir:

Development of a multilayer perceptron (MLP) to estimate the porosity using well logs.
Development of a support vector machine (SVM) to estimate the porosity using well logs.
Comparing the proposed methods and choosing the best.
Estimation of porosity based on seismic attributes using the selected algorithm.
Making a three-dimensional model of the reservoir porosity based on the training machine.

As it was expected, these computational intelligence approaches overcome the weakness of the standard regression techniques. Generally, the results show that the performances of Support Vector Machine outperform that Multilayer Perceptron neural networks. In addition, Support Vector Regression (SVR) is more robust, easier and quicker to train. Therefore, it could be concluded that the use of SVM technique will be valuable and powerful for geoscientists to model the reservoir properties.


Main Subjects

AL-Bazzaz, W. H, Al-Mehanna, Y. W. and Gupta, A., 2007, Permeability Modeling Using Neural-Networks Approach for Complex Mauddud-Burgan Carbonate Reservoir SPE 105337.
Ali, K, 1994, Neural Networks: A New Tool for the Petroleum Industry, SPE.
Aminzadeh, F. and Brouwer, F. 2006, Integrating Neural Networks and Fuzzy Logic for Improved Reservoir Property Prediction and Prospect Ranking. SEG New Orleans 2006 Annual Meeting.
Balan, B., Mohaghegh, S. and Ameri, S., 1995, State-of-the-Art in Permeability Determination from Well Log Data: Part I. Comparative study, model development. SPE Eastern Regional Conference and Exhibition, West Virginia, 17–21.
Bean M. and Jutten C., 2000, Neural Networks in Geophysical Applications, Geophysics, 65, 1032-1047.
Bolandi, V., Kadkhodaie, A. and Farzi, R., 2017, Analyzing organic richness of source rocks from well log data by using svm and ann classifiers: A case study from the kazhdumi formation, the persian gulf basin, offshore iran.
Cortes, C. and Vapnik, V., 1995, Support-Vector Networks. Machine Learning, 20, 273-297.
Leiphart, D. J. and Hart, B. S., 2001, Case History Comparison of Linear Regression and Probabilistic Neural Network to Predict Porosity from 3-D seismic Attributes in Lower Brushy Canyon Channel Sandstones, Southeast New Mexico, Geophysics, 66(5), 1349-1358.
Doyen, P. M., 1998, Porosity from seismic data -A geostatistical approach: Geophysics, 3, 1263-1275.
Eshafei, M. and Gharib, M., 2007, Neural Network Identification of Hydrocarbon Potential of Shaly Sand Reservoirs, Technical Symposium SPE.
Gholami, A. and Ansari, H. R., 2017, Estimation of porosity from seismic attributes using a committee model with bat-inspired optimization algorithm. J Pet Sci Eng 152:238–249.
Hommel, J., Coltman, E. and Holger, C., 2018, Porosity – permeability relations for evolving pore space: a review with a focus on (bio-)geochemically altered porous media. Transp Porous Med. 124(2):589–629.
Hosseini, E., Gholami, R. and Hajivand, F., 2019., Geostatistical modeling and spatial distribution analysis of porosity and permeability in the Shurijeh-B reservoir of Khangiran gas field in Iran. J Pet Explor Prod Technol, 9, 1051–1073.
Kumar, R., Das, B., Chatterjee, R. and Sain, K., 2016, A methodology of porosity estimation from inversion of post stack seismic data. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 28, 356–364.
Linqi, Z., Zhang, C. and Guo, C., 2018, Calculating the total porosity of shale reservoirs by combining conventional logging and elemental logging to eliminate the effects of gas saturation. Petrophysics, 59(2), 162–84.
Mori, T. and Leite, E. P., 2018, Porosity Prediction of a Carbonate Reservoir in Campos Basin Based on the Integration of Seismic Attributes and Well Log Data. (2018).
Perrin, C., Rafik, M., Akbar, M. and Jain, S., 2007, Integration of Borehole Image to Enhance Conventional Electrofacies Analysis in Dual Porosity Carbonate Reservoirs, SPE, 11622, International Petroleum Technology Conference, Dubai, UAE 6-4 December.
Saggaf, M. M., Toksöz, M. N. and Marhoon, M. I., 2003, Seismic Facies Classification and Identification by Competitive Neural Networks, Geophysics, 68(6), 1984-1999.
Schutz, P. S., Hattori, M. and Corbett, C., 1994, Seismic guided estimation of log properties, parts 1,2, and 3: The Leading Edge,13,305-310,674-678, and 770-776.
Sippel, M., 2003, Reservoir Characterization from Seismic and Well Control with Intelligent Computing Software, AAPG Annual Convention, Salt Lake City, Utah, May 11-14.
Soto, R.B., Bernal, M.C. and Silva, B., 2000, How to Improve Reservoir Characterization using Intelligent Systems. SPE 62938.
Soto, R., Torres, B.F., Arango, S. and Cobaleda, G., 2001, Improved Reservoir Permeability Models from Flow Units and Soft Computing Techniques. A Case Study, Suria and Reforma-Libertad, SPE 69625.
Wang, L., 2005, Support Vector Machines: Theory and Applications, STUDFUZZ, volume 177.
Xie, M., Mayer, KU., Claret, F., Alt-Epping, P., Jacques, D., Steefel, C., Chiaberge, C. and Simunek, J., 2015, Implementation and evaluation of permeability-porosity and tortuosity-porosity relationships linked to mineral dissolution-precipitation. Comput Geo Sci., 19(3), 655–71.