A research on the statistical relationships between auroras and geoinduced currents in power electric systems of the Russian Arctic

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

Department of Informatics, Ufa University of Science and Technology, Ufa, Russia.

چکیده

Confident progress in developing the Russian Federation’s Arctic zone requires minimizing the negative impacts of space weather on electric power systems within the auroral oval. Some scientific studies propose methods for remote diagnostics of geoinduced currents (GIC) levels. However, despite the high accuracy of these methods, their applicability remains uncertain, and they cannot be implemented in regions lacking a dense coverage of reliable geomagnetic data sources, such as the Taimyr and Gydan Peninsulas and northern Yakutia.
This paper discusses an approach to the non-hardware-based assessment of GIC levels in high-latitude electric power systems. The proposed method is based on GIC observation data from the Kola-Karelian transit area, which includes power transmission lines and substations forming a single chain over 1,100 km in length. Its distinctive feature is the use of auroras as natural indicators of the space weather conditions for problem-oriented interpretation.
Using the example of the Vykhodnoy substation in the Northern Transit main power grid, it has been shown that the most probable (averaged over 30 minutes) GIC levels are 0.08 A, 0.23 A, and 0.68 A when auroras are observed to the north, at the zenith, and to the south, respectively. The probability of the average half-hour GIC level exceeding 2 A (when auroras are observed to the north, at the zenith, and to the south) is approximately 6%, 10%, and 15%, respectively. Finally, promising modernization methods and the applicability limits of the proposed approach are discussed.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

A research on the statistical relationships between auroras and geoinduced currents in power electric systems of the Russian Arctic

نویسندگان [English]

  • Andrei V. Vorobev
  • Gulnara R. Vorobeva
Department of Informatics, Ufa University of Science and Technology, Ufa, Russia.
چکیده [English]

Confident progress in developing the Russian Federation’s Arctic zone requires minimizing the negative impacts of space weather on electric power systems within the auroral oval. Some scientific studies propose methods for remote diagnostics of geoinduced currents (GIC) levels. However, despite the high accuracy of these methods, their applicability remains uncertain, and they cannot be implemented in regions lacking a dense coverage of reliable geomagnetic data sources, such as the Taimyr and Gydan Peninsulas and northern Yakutia.
This paper discusses an approach to the non-hardware-based assessment of GIC levels in high-latitude electric power systems. The proposed method is based on GIC observation data from the Kola-Karelian transit area, which includes power transmission lines and substations forming a single chain over 1,100 km in length. Its distinctive feature is the use of auroras as natural indicators of the space weather conditions for problem-oriented interpretation.
Using the example of the Vykhodnoy substation in the Northern Transit main power grid, it has been shown that the most probable (averaged over 30 minutes) GIC levels are 0.08 A, 0.23 A, and 0.68 A when auroras are observed to the north, at the zenith, and to the south, respectively. The probability of the average half-hour GIC level exceeding 2 A (when auroras are observed to the north, at the zenith, and to the south) is approximately 6%, 10%, and 15%, respectively. Finally, promising modernization methods and the applicability limits of the proposed approach are discussed.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Geoinduced currents
  • Auroras
  • Geomagnetic variations
  • Space weather
  • High-latitude power systems
  • Statistical models
Barannik, M. B., Danilin, A. N., & Kat’kalov, Yu. V. (2012). A system for recording geomagnetically induced currents in neutrals of power autotransformers. Instruments and Experimental Techniques, 55(1), 110–115. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0020441211060121
Dimitrova, D. S., Kaishev, V. K., & Tan, S. (2020). Computing the Kolmogorov-Smirnov distribution when the underlying CDF is purely discrete, mixed, or continuous. Journal of Statistical Software, 95(10), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v095.i10
Dobbins, R. W., & Schriiver, K. (2015). Electrical claims and space weather: Measuring the visible effects of an invisible force. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/57bc8a4a414fb50147550a88/t/57d84e4d1b631b96124f3c69/1473793614089/2015+Zurich-Electrical+Claims+and+Space+Weather.pdf
Eckhard, L., Werner, A. S., & Markus, A. (2001). Log-normal distributions across the sciences: Keys and clues. BioScience, 51(5), 341–352.
Eroshenko, E. A., Belov, A. V., Boteler, D., Gaidash, S. P., Lobkov, S. L., Pirjola, R., & Trichtchenko, L. (2010). Effects of strong geomagnetic storms on Northern railways in Russia. Advances in Space Research, 46(9), 1102–1110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2010.05.017
Everitt, B. S. (2002). Cambridge dictionary of statistics (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Fukunishi, H., & Ayukawa, M. (1972). Auroral observations at Syowa Station, 1970-1971. Reports of the Japanese Antarctic Research Expedition, 36–68.  
Kataoka, R., & Ngwira, C. (2016). Extreme geomagnetically induced currents. Progress in Earth and Planetary Science, 3, 23.  
Marshall, R. A., Smith, E. A., Francis, M. J., Waters, C. L., & Sciffer, M. D. (2011). A preliminary risk assessment of the Australian region power network to space weather. Space Weather, 9, S10004. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011SW000685
PGI Geophysical data. (2013). January, February, March 2013 (V. Vorobjev, Ed.). PGI KSC RAS.
Pilipenko, V. A. (2021). Space weather impact on ground-based technological systems. Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 3, 72–110. https://doi.org/10.12737/szf-73202106
Pilipenko, V. A., Chernikov, A. A., Soloviev, A. A., Yagova, N. V., Sakharov, Ya. A., Kostarev, D. V., Kozyreva, O. V., Vorobev, A. V., & Belov, A. V. (2023). Influence of space weather on the reliability of the transport system functioning at high latitudes. Russian Journal of Earth Sciences, 23, ES2008. https://doi.org/10.2205/2023ES000824
Pirjola, R., Pulkkinen, A., & Viljanen, A. (2003). Studies of space weather effects on the Finnish natural gas pipeline and on the Finnish high-voltage power system. Advances in Space Research, 31(4), 795–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(02)00781-0
Pratscher, K. M., Ingham, M., Mac Manus, D. H., Kruglyakov, M., Heise, W., & Rodger, C. J. (2024). Modeling GIC in the southern South Island of Aotearoa New Zealand using magnetotelluric data. Space Weather, 22, e2024SW003907. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024SW003907
Radasky, W., Emin, Z., & Adams, R. (2019). CIGRE TB 780: Understanding of geomagnetic storm environment for high voltage power grids. Technical report.
Scott, D. W. (1979). On optimal and data-based histograms. Biometrika, 66(3), 605–610. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/66.3.605
Selivanov, V. N., Aksenovich, T. V., Bilin, V. A., Kolobov, V. V., & Sakharov, Y. A. (2023). Database of geomagnetically induced currents in the main transmission line “Northern Transit”. Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 3, 100–110. https://doi.org/10.12737/szf-93202311
Sigernes, F., Holmen, S. E., & Biles, D. (2014). Auroral all-sky camera calibration. Geoscientific Instrumentation, Methods and Data Systems, 3, 241–245. https://doi.org/10.5194/gi-3-241-2014
Soloviev, A. A., Sidorov, R. V., & Oshchenko, A. A. (2022). On the need for accurate monitoring of the geomagnetic field during directional drilling in the Russian Arctic. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth, 58, 420–434. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1069351322020124
Tanskanen, E. I. (2009). A comprehensive high-throughput analysis of substorms observed by IMAGE magnetometer network: Years 1993–2003 examined. Journal of Geophysical Research, 114, A05204. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JA013682
Vorobev, A. V., & Pilipenko, V. A. (2021). Geomagnetic data recovery approach based on the concept of digital twins. Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 2, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.12737/szf-72202105
Vorobev, A. V., Lapin, A. N., & Vorobeva, G. R. (2023). Software for automated recognition and digitization of archive data of aurora optical observations. Informatics and Automation, 22(5), 1177–1206. https://doi.org/10.15622/ia.22.5.8
Vorobev, A. V., Lapin, A. N., Soloviev, A. A., & Vorobeva, G. R. (2024). An approach to interpreting natural indicators of the state of space weather to assess the effects of its impact on high-latitude power systems. Physics of the Solid Earth, 4, 100–110. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0002333724040071
Vorobev, A. V., Pilipenko, V. A., Sakharov, Y. A., & Selivanov, V. N. (2019). Statistical relationships between variations of the geomagnetic field, auroral electrojet, and geomagnetically induced currents. Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 1, 48–58. https://doi.org/10.12737/szf-51201905
Vorobev, A. V., Soloviev, A. A., Pilipenko, V. A., & Vorobeva, G. R. (2022). Interactive computer model for aurora forecast and analysis. Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 2, 93–100. https://doi.org/10.12737/szf-82202213
Vorobev, A. V., Soloviev, A. A., Pilipenko, V. A., Vorobeva, G. R., Gainetdinova, A. A., Lapin, A. N., Belakhovsky, V. B., & Roldugin, A. V. (2023). Local diagnostics of aurora presence based on intelligent analysis of geomagnetic data. Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 9(2), 22–30. https://doi.org/10.12737/stp-92202303
Vorobev, A., Soloviev, A., Pilipenko, V., Vorobeva, G., & Sakharov, Y. (2022). An approach to diagnostics of geomagnetically induced currents based on ground magnetometers data. Applied Sciences, 12(3), 1522. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031522
Wintoft, P., Wik, M., & Viljanen, A. (2015). Solar wind-driven empirical forecast models of the time derivative of the ground magnetic field. Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate, 5, A7. https://doi.org/10.1051/swsc/2015008